"Think Different" was an ad campaign that Apple employed to commemorate historical figures who dared to think, dream, and challenge convention.
In this case, Google's dream of a wireless world has forced T-Mobile to reevaluate their own perspectives and philosophies on the wireless market.
Dispite all my gripes about the limitations imposed on G1 and who knows what else we don't know yet, the relationship between Google and T-Mobile has had a small ripple (for now) in the wireless industry.
Here is an example of that that I posted at Onxo .
Friday, September 26, 2008
Thursday, September 25, 2008
What The G1 Should Have Been
I game across these two pictures. This is what the G1 should have been. For those who are on the fence or were turned off by T-Mobile and Google's "open" phone, these phones are likely what we have to look forward if Android does well.
This first one was actually a college humor Photoshop work, the white one. It looks familiar to those who have been following Android since the beginning.
The second is the Samsung Pixon, an 8-MP phone. Right. 8-MP. But forget about that for the moment. We'll see that when Samsung, like Sony is comtemplating (it's not a negotiation ruse to get Microsoft to alter Windows Mobile terms), switches over to Android.
For now, let's just pretend it runs Android.
This first one was actually a college humor Photoshop work, the white one. It looks familiar to those who have been following Android since the beginning.
 |
The second is the Samsung Pixon, an 8-MP phone. Right. 8-MP. But forget about that for the moment. We'll see that when Samsung, like Sony is comtemplating (it's not a negotiation ruse to get Microsoft to alter Windows Mobile terms), switches over to Android.
For now, let's just pretend it runs Android.
 |
Android Has Serious Issues and Questions To Answer
There is plenty of time for Google and T-Mobile address issues and shortcomings with G1 before it is finally made available on October 22nd.
One of the issues is the 1GB 3G cap that T-Mobile sought fit to impose on potential G1 users. Everyone thought that was a bad idea. To my knowledge, no one has thought otherwise. And that has had an effect on folks like myself who were initially read to take out our credit cards and make the buy. (T-Mobile is still vague about it and Google seems awfully quiet, probably want to distance itself from this fiasco.)
Still, issues exist that will keep people from embracing what had been a promising mobile platform. Now, it is in danger of being marginalized by wireless providers and their demands so that they may retain control over their subscribers. And control is what they want.
So, when Phandroid's post attempts to marginalize the issues that remains and promises of openness broken in Google's deal with T-Mobile, it has effectively turned Android into another puppet and any future Android-based device becomes just another smartphones and Google will seem content to be the search engine and ad provider and users be damned.
Let's examine Phandroid's lack of concerns. Just the main ones. The lack of standard head jack or Amazon sales through Wi-Fi only doesn't bother me as much as other issues.
First, let me tackle VOIP. Phandroid doesn't think VOIP is important. If that were the case, why would T-Mobile specifically made sure Google disable any VOIP apps from working on the G1?
Let me take this a step further. What else are we not being told? What other apps are not allowed? This is an open platform, right? I think most mobile warriors including myself have a different definition of "open" than T-Mobile and Google.
The other issue is Exchange support and wireless syncing only. I'm lumping this together. What this is is Google trying to get users to develop the habit of relying on cloud computing, specifically Google's, than on desktop computers, meaning Microsoft. I understand what it's trying to do here. The danger is that people may not be ready for just such a change. And it's not as if Google is offering a massive (or unlimited - guess we'll have to be careful about what Google's definition of "unlimited" is too) amount of storage in the cloud. Where are we suppose to put our data, music, and video?
So, there are a lot of questions we don't have an answer for and judging by the quick response from T-Mobile, the Android camp doesn't either. And none of these concerned, raised by anyone, should be so cavalierly dismissed.
Google has to step up and start dictating terms to the market.
Impact on mobile warriors: Google is happy. Not about the deal with T-Mobile. They are happy just to get the first Android phone out. And it likely know at this time, Android is not "open". But Google's got a foot in the door and that's what's important.
Phandroid's post
Note: Tonight or tomorrow, I'll get into how Google can totally kick ass. Yes, I want Android to succeed very much.
One of the issues is the 1GB 3G cap that T-Mobile sought fit to impose on potential G1 users. Everyone thought that was a bad idea. To my knowledge, no one has thought otherwise. And that has had an effect on folks like myself who were initially read to take out our credit cards and make the buy. (T-Mobile is still vague about it and Google seems awfully quiet, probably want to distance itself from this fiasco.)
Still, issues exist that will keep people from embracing what had been a promising mobile platform. Now, it is in danger of being marginalized by wireless providers and their demands so that they may retain control over their subscribers. And control is what they want.
So, when Phandroid's post attempts to marginalize the issues that remains and promises of openness broken in Google's deal with T-Mobile, it has effectively turned Android into another puppet and any future Android-based device becomes just another smartphones and Google will seem content to be the search engine and ad provider and users be damned.
Let's examine Phandroid's lack of concerns. Just the main ones. The lack of standard head jack or Amazon sales through Wi-Fi only doesn't bother me as much as other issues.
First, let me tackle VOIP. Phandroid doesn't think VOIP is important. If that were the case, why would T-Mobile specifically made sure Google disable any VOIP apps from working on the G1?
Let me take this a step further. What else are we not being told? What other apps are not allowed? This is an open platform, right? I think most mobile warriors including myself have a different definition of "open" than T-Mobile and Google.
The other issue is Exchange support and wireless syncing only. I'm lumping this together. What this is is Google trying to get users to develop the habit of relying on cloud computing, specifically Google's, than on desktop computers, meaning Microsoft. I understand what it's trying to do here. The danger is that people may not be ready for just such a change. And it's not as if Google is offering a massive (or unlimited - guess we'll have to be careful about what Google's definition of "unlimited" is too) amount of storage in the cloud. Where are we suppose to put our data, music, and video?
So, there are a lot of questions we don't have an answer for and judging by the quick response from T-Mobile, the Android camp doesn't either. And none of these concerned, raised by anyone, should be so cavalierly dismissed.
Google has to step up and start dictating terms to the market.
Impact on mobile warriors: Google is happy. Not about the deal with T-Mobile. They are happy just to get the first Android phone out. And it likely know at this time, Android is not "open". But Google's got a foot in the door and that's what's important.
Phandroid's post
Note: Tonight or tomorrow, I'll get into how Google can totally kick ass. Yes, I want Android to succeed very much.
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Post-Android News (Updated September 24, 2008)
The prudent thing is to wait a few days or even a week after an event we had this week with the introduction of G1 by Google and, really, T-Mobile to the world.
There was a lot of excitement. But as the details came out, we feel less and less thrilled about what we see. To begin with, the comparison to the iPhone was missing but there were subtle jabs at Apple's walled garden. And Apple doesn't deny that.
However, to say that Android is open is not true at all. There's spin so I don't want to call anyone a liar. Let's face it. It's Google OS for all intent and purposes. Not all apps will be allowed on G1. T-Mobile made sure VOIP, for one, does not make it onto the G1.
Then T-Mobile went ahead to cap the 3G access at 1GB. It was only furor over such fine print that T-Mobile removed the statement and vague warned potential customers that we are still subject to speed bumps if we get in the way of them running a smooth 3G experience.
After some musing, I've decided to give the G1 another look. I really want to see one in person and feel it in my hand before going ahead and order one. I love the fact that Google has developed an OS and looks to change how mobile users work, play, and communicate.
Plus, Google is a formidable competitor in any arena they enter because they are young, hungry, and with deep pockets. Google has been laying the ground work for Android to do well. Look for multiple devices based on Android to hit the market. G1 is just the first step. We've mentioned before whoever makes apps work outside of mobile handhelds will have the potential gain customers outside of the customary smartphone market.
So, those are my thoughts. Now, here are some from others across the political spectrum on mobility.
Thoughts in specs, features, and plans:
There was a lot of excitement. But as the details came out, we feel less and less thrilled about what we see. To begin with, the comparison to the iPhone was missing but there were subtle jabs at Apple's walled garden. And Apple doesn't deny that.
However, to say that Android is open is not true at all. There's spin so I don't want to call anyone a liar. Let's face it. It's Google OS for all intent and purposes. Not all apps will be allowed on G1. T-Mobile made sure VOIP, for one, does not make it onto the G1.
Then T-Mobile went ahead to cap the 3G access at 1GB. It was only furor over such fine print that T-Mobile removed the statement and vague warned potential customers that we are still subject to speed bumps if we get in the way of them running a smooth 3G experience.
After some musing, I've decided to give the G1 another look. I really want to see one in person and feel it in my hand before going ahead and order one. I love the fact that Google has developed an OS and looks to change how mobile users work, play, and communicate.
Plus, Google is a formidable competitor in any arena they enter because they are young, hungry, and with deep pockets. Google has been laying the ground work for Android to do well. Look for multiple devices based on Android to hit the market. G1 is just the first step. We've mentioned before whoever makes apps work outside of mobile handhelds will have the potential gain customers outside of the customary smartphone market.
So, those are my thoughts. Now, here are some from others across the political spectrum on mobility.
Thoughts in specs, features, and plans:
- jkontherun on T-Mobile's 3G backtrack. They are also suspicious.
- Onxo on why T-Mobile was less evil today.
- CNet's side-by-side comparison between the iPhone and G1. Some info already dated like the 1GB cap.
- GigaOM thinks there's more to this T-Mobile spin about the 1GB cap. This is like when Google tried to pull a fast one over us with the Chrome statement.
- Silicon Alley Insider offers another perspective on T-Mobile's attempt to handicap Android.
- Gizmodo on comparing developing for our two favorite companies.
- Onxo wants more than specs comparisons.
- TechNewsWorld says there are factors to consider in choosing.
- Engadget offers video comparison between iPhone and G1 and other G1 videos.
- Gizmodo's post of all their posts.
- iPhone Matters linked to InfoWorld to discuss SDK.
- Former Google manager can't understand Android.
- Marketwatch does not see a market changer in G1.
- Wired on how Google can save Android. Fragmentation is the word of the day.
- jkOnTheRun on G1's limitations and how developers can fill the gap.
- Silicon Alley calls G1 "safe".
- Mossblog lukewarm on G1. MacDailyNews' commentaries.
- Seeking Alpha on Jonathan Ives but also talked about Android. MacDailyNews' commentaries.
- Roughly Drafted on Android challenges. It's as if we have to choose between the iPhone or G1 for President.
- Appleinsider believes there is nothing similar that warrants comparison.
- iPhone Matters - 10 things iPhone has to do to catch up to G1? (updated Thusday noon)
- Business Week - Don't underestimate Apple either.
- iSmash Phone analyzes where G1 falls short. (updated Thusday afternoon)
- Mainstream media now realizes G1 shortcomings.
- SF Gate asks if Google is evil.
- Google's word on Android.
- CNet doesn't think Apple, RIM, and Microsoft should underestimate Android.
- Android Guys compare G1 to Amiga.
- Phandroid offered a view and video from the perspective of an Android fan.
- TmoNews on G1 unlocking and new data issues.
- Engadget offers what they like or don't like about G1.
- Symbian Freak asks if Android will put Symbian to rest. Guys, this is Nokia with a lot of deep pocket too. Oh, but it's Nokia.
- Time believes Jobs is in danger of repeating history with Android. Macdaily's pro-Apple rebuttal.
Those who think Google will have to work hard but are in the middle and news:
- FT thinks there are a lot of players who will give Android a lot of competition.
- LA Times thinks this will be a long long duel. I agree.
- Electronista reports Sony mulling Android. This was not unexpected. Android powered PSP, anyone?
- Kotaku reports Gameloft will make games for Android.
- Crunchgear reports Google offered final Android SDK to everyone, not just folks they like. If you recall, they secretly gave certain developers a version of SDK not available to everyone. I think Google did apologize for getting caught, not for the deed itself.
- Wired on programmers who got rejected by Apple. Not all are going to Android.
- Android Guys on G1 shortcomings. Good and honest. Very fair.
T-Mobile Is Now Less Evil
But still a baddy. Make no mistake.
Today, Engadget is reporting that T-Mobile has decided to remove the 1GB cap and promises to make it an issue for only a small number of users who may abuse the network.
Nevertheless, it's not something I'm looking for. I'm looking for an iPhone like data plan. Unlimited.
Still a move in the right direction. Now, if Google can grow some and use this opportunity to push back and "open" up G1, that's go a long way in my book in getting more folks to buy into the new exciting platform.
I love a remark by one of Engadget's readers: looks like the bullet extraction procedure from the foot went well.
Source: Engadget
Detailed Explanation of Diff Between G1 And the iPhone
I posted a few key differences between the iPhone and the G1 over at Onxo .
I found some explanations explaining the difference at Network World that warrants reading and I highlighted some important ones.
At the same time, it's only been a day or so since the unveiling of the G1. It's worth noting that things can change between now and October 22nd.
Particularly, I'm hoping T-Mobile will realize the 1GB cap on 3G access is pretty stupid.
I found some explanations explaining the difference at Network World that warrants reading and I highlighted some important ones.
At the same time, it's only been a day or so since the unveiling of the G1. It's worth noting that things can change between now and October 22nd.
Particularly, I'm hoping T-Mobile will realize the 1GB cap on 3G access is pretty stupid.
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
The Party's Over
The clean up crew has moved in and started putting away the decoration, the chairs, and get it ready for the Boggle club tomorrow.
So, what a day for Google, THC, and T-Mobile, eh?
Now that the party's over, it's time to look a closer look at G1. The design. The software and interface. The partners. And finally, the reception.
Right now, there are few who are taking a way-and-see position. Not surprised. Google really played up our expectation since last year. So, either G1 met expectations or fell short. As far as falling short, I'm not talking about the phone itself but the entire pack.
Either way, Android's influence has rippled across the mobile market. And make no mistakes, they are mere ripples as far as I can tell at the moment.
I'll be honest. I'm an iPhone user and I love most things about Apple products (not so cool with their cult status, secrecy, and draconian practices). After spending over an hour trying to back through the throng of early adopters, I finally was able to log into my T-Mobile account and get G1 product page and was all set to check out when certain started showing up on the blogs covering the G1 launch.
And I had already promised my iPhone to my brother. So, what are some of these things that bug me?
So, what a day for Google, THC, and T-Mobile, eh?
Now that the party's over, it's time to look a closer look at G1. The design. The software and interface. The partners. And finally, the reception.
Right now, there are few who are taking a way-and-see position. Not surprised. Google really played up our expectation since last year. So, either G1 met expectations or fell short. As far as falling short, I'm not talking about the phone itself but the entire pack.
Either way, Android's influence has rippled across the mobile market. And make no mistakes, they are mere ripples as far as I can tell at the moment.
I'll be honest. I'm an iPhone user and I love most things about Apple products (not so cool with their cult status, secrecy, and draconian practices). After spending over an hour trying to back through the throng of early adopters, I finally was able to log into my T-Mobile account and get G1 product page and was all set to check out when certain started showing up on the blogs covering the G1 launch.
And I had already promised my iPhone to my brother. So, what are some of these things that bug me?
- 3G access. 1GB limit per month and then they throttle you down to 50kbps after that for the rest of the month. T-Mobile and Google has said that won't happen. Fine, then take it off the contract. Why hide it in fine print?
- No regular headjack. Let's see. $180 for G1 plus $25 for the adapter. No longer cheaper than the iPhone. Oh, let's not forget, I'll have to get a 8GB memory card to do anything with the phone.
- No multi-touch. Not an issue since the iPhone is the only device available with multi-touch as far as I can tell. What's the big deal then, right? Well, when you're used to navigating on the iPhone's screen with multiple fingers it's hard to adjust to not having that feature.
And this is the problem I have with Android. It's "open". It's what they kept bring up over and over again during the conference this morning. And something about that bugged me a bit.
In recent day, Apple has been chastised by developers regarding its NDA regarding iPhone development and app rejections. In fact, just today, Apple extended its NDA reach to cover the rejection letters.
So, Apple horrible, Google good, right? Not so fast. Wired confirmed some of my misgivings at this point.
- No VOIP. Even Apple didn't make that restriction. T-Mobile "had 'worked with Google' to make sure Android couldn't run VOIP". No VOIP. Are you kidding me? VOIP potential is why Apple added a small speakers and "voice recording" function to the iPod Touch.
- Reliance on Google and all things Google. If you want an Android, you will have to submit to the fact that you'll need a Google account (of which I have four) in order to appreciate all G1's functions. Well, you don't have a choice. You have to have one when you get G1. Apple does not require a MobileMe account before using the iPhone.
- Rough finishes. Gizmodo pointed it out. Look I love Google services for the most part. I think I will eventually get an Android device if G1 is not what I get later this month. But I also get the feeling that somehow, I'm being pressed into a beta program, you know, like other Google beta programs.
- It's not open, guys. We're going to learn over the days and weeks what we can or cannot do. We shouldn't have to do that if it's a truly open system. Wired: "We want to be open in a way that consumers can rely on," T-Mobile CTO Cole Brodman told Wired's Daniel Roth. Translation: We don't really want to be open.
You may be thinking, "hey, your post seems pretty negative". Well, that's not the point of this post. Rather, if I'm going to get locked in for two years, I want to make sure I am using a truly mobile device that has the ability hold me over for the duration of my contract.
I am still holding onto dear hope that some of my concerns such as 3G usage will be changed before G1 is available for purchase.
Note: I'll be posting a summary of opinions and links of the days event and hope to update my initial analysis of G1 and associated services. Google has been known to stop on a dime and go in a different direction. I don't know how they can do that with a wireless provider as a liability. If anyone can do it, it's Google.
Monday, September 22, 2008
Sites With Live Blogging on G1 Press Event
Here are Sites with live blogging for tomorrow's Android press event:
- Cnet (My experience in the last is that they're pretty slow - like they're mesmerized, it's as if Jobs had it reality distortion field on at maximum)
- Gizmodo - Excellent source
- Engadget - Excellent source
- Android Community
- Android Guys
- Livecrunch
And of course, you can go directly to T-Mobile to watch the webcast. If you're here before the event starts, you can catch up on pre-launch news, analysis, and predictions on the new Android device.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
